[Peeweelinux] block size and compact flash

[Troy Engel]

Hmmm, I was intrigued as well -- we use 1024 on the 'extra' ext3 
partition on purpose, as the system records a lot of tiny files. I found 
an interesting thread that would seem to indicate 4096 or 8192 would 
work just fine -- faster, but waste space.

http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2003-April/003746.html

-te

Ricardo Trindade wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I was wondering about the possible implications of setting -b 4096 or -b
> 1024 on the target load scripts.
> 
> Specifically, I'm worried about compact flash usage.
> 
> thanks
> Ricardo
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Peeweelinux mailing list
> Peeweelinux@adis.on.ca
> http://mail.adis.on.ca/lists/listinfo/peeweelinux

-- 
Troy Engel | Systems Engineer
Fluid, Inc | http://www.fluid.com