[Peeweelinux] Hello and a question

[Tom Schneider]

I've had great luck with the latest 2.4 kernel. (2.4.18)  Plus I've 
upgraded most of the standard peewee linux packages to the latest Redhat 
7.3 packages.  I'm running on a PC/104 486 with 48 MB ram and 64 MB 
disk-on-chip.  If you follow the tutorial and know your way around the 
basics of kernel building, it's not too hard.  (If not, get the Kernel 
Howto can fix that)
Tom

Ricardo Trindade wrote:

>there is a guide to upgrading the kernel in the mailing list archives.
>however, if the one includede does what you need, I think you should keep
>it, it's stable.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: peeweelinux-admin@adis.on.ca
>[mailto:peeweelinux-admin@adis.on.ca]On Behalf Of Cem Eryasar
>Sent: sexta-feira, 22 de Novembro de 2002 23:05
>To: peeweelinux@adis.on.ca
>Subject: [Peeweelinux] Hello and a question
>
>
>Hello all!
>
>It's nice to see people doing embedded linux stuff.
>I downloaded the Peewee and gave it a go. I tried it on an embedded
>486 board. Looks really good.
>
>However, here is my first question:
>
>Do I have to stay with the built in 2.2.17 kernel?
>If it's possible is it better to move on another one? Like 2.2.22?
>
>How can I compare kernel versions? Is it always good to go for a
>recent one from kernel.org?
>
>Thanks a lot!
>Cem Eryasar - Cemer
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Peeweelinux mailing list
>Peeweelinux@adis.on.ca
>http://mail.adis.on.ca/lists/listinfo/peeweelinux
>
>_______________________________________________
>Peeweelinux mailing list
>Peeweelinux@adis.on.ca
>http://mail.adis.on.ca/lists/listinfo/peeweelinux
>  
>