experiences with PWL0.53.10 (some problems?)
Dean Brown
[email protected]
Fri, 10 Nov 2000 13:24:26 -0800
Adi Linden wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have some answers...
>
> > I am experiencing the following with PWL0.53.10:
> >
> > a) when I tried to extract a file system to a CompactFlash IDE target
> > device (/dev/hdc) from pwlconfig, I always get the following:
> >
> > "testing that nothing is mounted on mount directory" ...failed
This happens to me if the device is mounted prior to loading the
filesystem onto the CF device. Do a umount /dev/hdc first and the
problem should go away.
> Seeing that rd_dialog works, the actual script that loads the filesystem
> is alright. What do you see when you go to
>
> Configure Target Hardware -->
>
> Did pwlconfig ask you to create a new configuration file (it should have)
> when you tried to load your target? All I can think of is that the path to
> the temporary mount directory is not correct. It should say something
> like:
>
> Device Mount Point: "./mnt"
>
> > b) On another note, the minimal configuration example that comes with
> > PWL0.53.10 tries to extract, as kernel,
> > ./packages/Kernel/kernel-basic-2.2.17.list, which does not exist (at
> > least not in the distro I have). Hence,, the system generated does not
> > have a kernel. Furthermore, I have noticed that even If you select
> > another kernel, project.conf always includes
> > ./packages/Kernel/kernel-basic-2.2.17.list, hence the error is also
> > generated, despite your selected kernel included okay (that happens
> > whenever your project is based on "minimal". If you start your new
> > project from the scratch, it does not happen).
>
> Did you upgrade to 0.53.10 by downloading the peeweelinux-*-cfg.tar.gz
> package or did you download the complete bin or src archive?
I've just recently seen that same error and I haven't tried the example
configurations. I have however just re-installed the original 0.53 then
0.53-8 and then 0.53-10.
Another minor annoyance that I've noticed is that if a 'load target'
fails, any subsequent attempt within the same pwlconfig session will
also report a failure, even if the load succeeded. This appears to be a
case of the failure flag not being cleared in the beginning of the load
script.
--
Dean Brown
---------------------------------------------------
See the list archives at http://adis.on.ca/archives/
See the PWL homepage at http://peeweelinux.com
---------------------------------------------------